Higgins v. Branam
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
LUMPKIN, VICE-PRESIDING JUDGE:
CONCUR IN PART/DISSENT IN PART
T1 I concur in the Court's authority to adjudicate the legal issues before it. However, I must dissent when the Court oversteps its bounds and violates the doctrine of separation of powers by interfering with the manner in which the executive branch administers sentences.
T2 The authority of the executive branch, for our purposes, the Department of Corree-tions, to administer sentences is well established by case law and state statute. See Fields v. Driesel, 1997 OK CR 33, ¶¶ 20-21, 941 P.2d 1000, 1005. In Williams v. State, 2004 OK…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fields v. DrieselCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004