Legal Opinion

American Sugar Refining Co. v. Rutan

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 4, 1903PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Suits to Recover Internal Revenue Taxes Paid.

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

These suits, involving the same questions of law, the facts being admitted, have been, by consent of counsel, consolidated.

The actions are in assumpsit, and the plea in each case is the general issue. The actions are brought to recover from the defendants, who are or were collectors of internal revenues, money alleged to have been demanded by and paid to them under the provision of the twenty-seventh section of the war revenue act, which took effect June 13, 1898 (Act June 13, 1898, c. 448, 30 Stat. 456 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2297]). The tax was levied upon the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClainCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902
  2. Spreckels Sugar-Refining Co. v. McClainU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Sugar Refining Co. v. RutanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API