Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Guillory v. Service Life & Casualty Insurance Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided August 30, 2001No. 09-01-036 CVPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGaultney, Justice

I concur only in the vacating of the summary judgment; I would vacate and remand the cause to permit an abatement to afford an opportunity to amend pleadings. I respectfully dissent in all other respects.

First, the lack of legal authority to sue is not an affirmative defense, if by affirmative defense the majority means that defendant has the burden of proof on the issue after a verified denial is filed. True, a verified denial of plaintiffs capacity to sue must be filed by defendant or the issue is waived; but the pleading requirement does not mean defendant has the burden of proof on the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Texas Beef Cattle Co. v. GreenTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Coastal Liquids Transportation, L.P. v. Harris County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Price v. Estate of AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Lighthouse Church of Cloverleaf v. Texas BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API