Schanker v. Wollowick
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BARKDULL, Judge.
The appellants seek review of a final judgment, rendered subsequent to a non-jury trial, adjudicating that the appellants were liable on a certain promissory note •given to the appellee.
The defense urged by the appellants was payment of the note. This was in the nature of an affirmative defense and required them to sustain the burden of proof. Bacon v. Green, 36 Fla. 325, 18 So. 870; Heitman v. Davis, 127 Fla. 1, 172 So. 705; Hough v. Menses, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 410; 25 Fla.Jur., Pleadings, § 77 The evidence adduced by the parties was conflicting on the question of payment; the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hough v. MensesSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Bacon v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- Ross v. Florida Sun Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
- Krohne v. Orlando Farming CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Chakford v. StrumSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Buchman v. HirschDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976