Legal Opinion

State Of California v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1965No. 19394_1Published

1Opinion of the Court

345 F.2d 917

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Turlock Irrigation District, California, and Modesto Irrigation District, California, United States of America on the relation of Stewart L. Udall, Petitioners,

v.

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 19394.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

May 18, 1965.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1965.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., J. M. Sanderson, Deputy Atty. Gen. of Cal., Sacramento, Cal., for petitioner State of California.

Robert L. McCarty, Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., Billy Dwight Perry, of McCarty & Wheatley, Washington, D. C.,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. United States Ex Rel. Chapman v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Federal Power Commission v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API