Curbello v. Vaughn
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
We dismissed the first appeal of this case as premature because no formal judgment had been entered. Curbello v. Vaughn, 76 N.M. 687, 417 P.2d 881. Findings of fact and conclusions of law had been entered by Honorable E. T. Hensley, Jr., the trial judge, who is now Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals. A judgment conforming to the decision of Judge Hensley has now been entered by Judge Blythe of the Ninth Judicial District sitting by stipulation. This appeal is from that judgment
The action sought specific performance of an oral agreement to devise certain real estate to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Edington v. AlbaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- Laumbach v. LaumbachNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
- Curbello v. VaughnNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Aguayo v. Village of ChamaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
- DeTevis v. AragonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Trigg v. AllemandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Benton v. Albuquerque National BankNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.