Legal Opinion
Grace v. Carroll
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge.
This is an action by the settlor of an inter-vivos trust to require the trustees to account for and pay over to plaintiff the corpus and income of the trust fund. Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The defendants, the surviving trustee and the executors of the estate of the deceased co-trustee, have moved pursuant to Rule 19(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., 1 to join the Attorney General of the State of New York as a party defendant. 2
The trust was created on October 9, 1945, and by its terms continued until its termination on November 1, 1960.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shields v. BarrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Allen v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Stewart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Lloyd's American Trust Fund LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Virginia Harris v. George W. Bailey, Hudson Sterling, Marshall ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Wright Farms Construction, Inc. v. KrepsDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1977
- National Surety Corp. v. Globe Indemnity Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Central-Penn National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.