Legal Opinion

Firth v. Farmers-Citizens Bank

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1984No. 1-783A214PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Robert J. Firth, defendant-appellant, appeals a judgment in favor of Farmers Citizens Bank, plaintiff-appellee, on its complaint seeking payment of a check plus interest, costs, and attorneys' fees. Firth wrote a check to the Bank as payment for a third party's debt. Firth argues that the Bank was not a "holder in due course", that he was not liable because of misrepresentation, and that there was a lack of consideration.

Judgment affirmed.

We first note that Firth has come close to waiving any alleged errors for failure to make a coherent argument supported by authority.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. WalshAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  2. Cheltenham National Bank v. SnellingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Standard Finance Co., Ltd. v. EllisHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. American Plan Corp. v. WoodsOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. K-Ross Building Supply Center, Inc. v. Winnipesauke Chalets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kane v. KrollCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. In Re Joe Morgan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  3. Kunkel v. First National Bank of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Utility Contractors Financial Services, Inc. v. Amsouth Bank N.A. (In re Joe Morgan, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API