Legal Opinion

Claflin v. Fletcher

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana

Decided May 31, 1881PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Demurrer.

1Opinion of the Court

Gresham, D. J.

Tin's suit is brought by, Claflin & Co. against Stoughton A. Fletcher and Francis Churchman, for the value of a lot of dry goods which one George Hazard, by fraudulently representing that he was solvent, when in fact he was insolvent, induced the plaintiffs to soil to him on time.

It is averred that Fletcher & Churchman bought the goods at sale on execution against Hazard, after being notified of the latter’s fraud, and that the plaintiffs had cancelled the sale and demanded possession of the property.

The defendants answer that for some time before their purchase of the goods…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CandelariaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. DollarDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1951
  3. Huffman v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  4. White v. MileyWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. United States v. CandelariaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API