Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.
The problems presented on these appeals relate to the controversy which was before the Supreme Court in Estate of Gilmaker, 57 Cal.2d 627 [21 Cal.Rptr. 585, 371 P.2d 321], In the opinion therein it was stated in part (57 Cal.2d, at page 633) : “The removal and substitution of a trustee is largely within the discretion of the trial court. [Citations.] It is undisputed, however, that the trustee failed to disperse the surplus cash of $49,000 and failed to provide a segregated semi-annual accounting. The trustee’s only defense, which is insufficient, was that it is not legally obligated to do…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Trusteeships Under Will of DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Dickerson v. Camden Trust CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Conservatorship of LefkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Marshall v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wells Fargo Bank v. GumpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hartman v. BurfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968