Legal Opinion

Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 27, 1964No. Docket Nos. 27170, 27609PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFord, J.

The problems presented on these appeals relate to the controversy which was before the Supreme Court in Estate of Gilmaker, 57 Cal.2d 627 [21 Cal.Rptr. 585, 371 P.2d 321], In the opinion therein it was stated in part (57 Cal.2d, at page 633) : “The removal and substitution of a trustee is largely within the discretion of the trial court. [Citations.] It is undisputed, however, that the trustee failed to disperse the surplus cash of $49,000 and failed to provide a segregated semi-annual accounting. The trustee’s only defense, which is insufficient, was that it is not legally obligated to do…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Gilmaker v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. In Re Trusteeships Under Will of DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Dickerson v. Camden Trust CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Conservatorship of LefkowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. Marshall v. First National Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Estate of MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Wells Fargo Bank v. GumpCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Hartman v. BurfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API