Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Grant Macfarlane

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1960No. 9051Published

1DissentWade, Justice

The recommendation by the Bar Commission is based on our affirming the trial court’s finding of fraud and undue influence in a will contest case of In re Swan’s Estate1 where there is a more detailed statement of the case.

There we held that “[W]here a confidential adviser is made the beneficiary in a will, receives gifts or possible benefits from transactions with the person who relies on his advice and counsel on such matters in the making or execution of which he actively participates, a presumption of fraud and undue influence arises, which shifts the burden of persuading the trier of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. MacKall v. MacKallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. In Re the Discipline of LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. In Re Swan's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  4. In re EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Sears v. VaughanIllinois Supreme Court · 1907

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API