State v. Ferrette
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Clifford F. Brown, J.,
The first question posed in this appeal is whether the indictments for forgery and uttering in violation of R.C. 2913.31 should have been dismissed on the ground that the State Lottery Commission cannot be the object of a fraud. We hold that the trial court correctly overruled appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictments.
R.C. 2913.31(A) provides in part that “[n]o person, with purpose to defraud, * * * shall do any of the following * * *.” Ohio law does not require that there be an object to the commission of a fraud. R.C. 2913.01(B) states: “ ‘Defraud’ means to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. GarrettOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. SpencerOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.