Legal Opinion

The General Smith

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 U.S. 214 (____)

4 Wheat. 214

The GENERAL SMITH: HOLLINS et al., Claimants.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 9th. Pinkney, for the appellants and claimants.

*443] *March 10th, 1819. STORY, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court.

No doubt is entertained by this court, that the admiralty rightfully possesses a general jurisdiction in cases of material-men; and if this had been a suit in personam, there would not have been any hesitation in sustaining the jurisdiction of the district court. Where, however, the proceeding is in rem, to enforce a specific lien, it is incumbent upon those who…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833
  3. The Steamer St. LawrenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Cohn v. United States Corset Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. The AuroraSupreme Court of the United States · 1816

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horton v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  2. Dear v. BrannonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
  3. Harmony v. . BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Harmony v. BinghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API