Peerson v. Johnson & Johnson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
The appeal is from the judgment of the trial court overruling the defendant’s motion for a new trial.
The grounds of the motion are: (1) That the verdict was contrary to the evidence; and (2) that the verdict was for $105.76, and therefore erroneous as being in excess of the ■ jurisdiction of a justice ’of the peace, plaintiff having recovered judgment for $100 in justice’s court, and the cause being on appeal therefrom in the circuit court.
1. The action is brought by an insurance agency on an account for a balance due for premiums paid by the plaintiff agency for defendant on fire insurance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pruitt v. StuartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- Richmond & Danville Railroad v. HuttoSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Anderson v. WintonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
3Cited by2 opinions
- May v. DraperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Knight v. Taylor Real Estate & InsuranceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955