Stretcher v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
803 So.2d 813 (2001)
Lester STRETCHER, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D01-2943.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
December 19, 2001.
Lester Stretcher, Atlanta, Georgia, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
2Per curiam
We affirm the denial of appellant's rule 3.850 motion and certify as a question of great public importance the same question certified in Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550, 552 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001):
WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Major v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
4Cited by18 opinions
- Love v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Hampton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Doyle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Bush v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.