United States v. Roof

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Richard Mark Gergel, United States District Court Judge

This matter came before the Court on Defendant’s motion to represent himself (Dkt. No. 666), defense counsel’s (then “Standby Counsel”)1 objections to limitations on the role of Standby Counsel (Dkt. No. 704), Standby Counsel’s objections to permitting Defendant to proceed pro se (Dkt. No. 718), and Defendant’s motion for the reappointment of counsel only for the guilt phase of trial (Dkt. No. 728). The Court granted Defendant’s motion to self-represent orally on November 28, 2016 (Dkt. No. 672 at 9), for reasons…