Legal Opinion

Conquistador v. Adamaitis

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 19, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00430Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT JEAN KARLO CONQUISTADOR, : Plaintiff, : : No. 3:19-cv-430 (KAD) v. : : ADAMAITIS, : Defendant. : : : ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS The plaintiff, Jean Karlo Conquistador (“Conquistador”), has filed three motions relating to discovery matters and one miscellaneous motion. Motion to Determine Sufficiency [ECF 39] Pursuant to Rule 36(a)(6), Conquistador has filed a motion asking the Court to determine the sufficiency of the defendant’s responses to his requests for admission. He contends that responses to requests 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 23, 24,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Henry v. Champlain Enterprises, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  2. United States v. ChristyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API