Legal Opinion

Surpless v. Surpless

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motior to -have a referee’s report sent back for further findings. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.

The question of damages to be allowed for breach of the partnership agreement was brought to the attention of the parties and of the referee on the hearing and was stated by the latter to be a matter of accounting. When the reference was closed, the objecting defendant made no requests to find pursuant to section 1023 of the Code of Civil Procedure, neither did he take any exceptions to the report of the referee pursuant to section 994 of the-Code.

It is conceded that the referee has complied with the statute in stating separately his findings of fact and conclusions of law, but the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fairman v. BrushNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Famous Manufacturing Co. v. GibsonNew York Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API