Beiles v. City of Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RUBEN CASTILLO, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Richard Beiles'brings this action against Defendants Chris Traynor and the City of Chicago (collectively, “Defendants”) alleging false arrest in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”), malicious prosecution under Illinois law, and intentional infliction of emotional distress under Illinois law. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted in part…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buchanan-Moore v. County of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Devenpeck v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Northern Indiana Gun & Outdoor Shows, Inc. v. City of South Bend, Stephen Leucke, Brian R. Hedman, and Karl KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Dan Richards v. Michael MitcheffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. SchismenosDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- Brogsdale v. Torres-CoronaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Brogsdale v. Torres-CoronaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Denson v. Village of JohnsburgDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Isreal v. ChovanecDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.