Hefner v. Urton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Sonoma County refusing a writ of assistance. The facts are- stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
In January, 1876, the defendant, W. L. Urton, .being the owner of certain premises, executed to the plaintiff a promissory' note for two thousand dollars, and a mortgage upon the premises to secure the payment of the note, which mortgage was duly recorded. Urton was a married man, residing with his family on the premises. In April, 1876, Urton made and filed for record a declaration of homestead of the premises mortgaged. The note became due in January, 1877, and in February, 1881, an action of foreclosure was commenced, said W. L. Urton being the sole defendant. A decree of foreclosure was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Graham v. OviattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by2 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Watts v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892