Client Follow-Up Co. v. Hynes
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ryan
In this case we are confronted with the question of whether section 5(c) of article IX of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 prohibits the imposition of an ad valorem tax on personal property after January 1, 1979, and if so, is the further provision of section 5(c) concerning the enactment of a replacement tax operable. Section 5(c) provides:
“On or before January 1, 1979, the General Assembly by law shall abolish all ad valorem personal property taxes and concurrently therewith and thereafter shall replace all revenue lost by units of local government and school districts as a result of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
- People ex rel. Woodyatt v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- People Ex Rel. Keenan v. McGuaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
- Fergus v. MarksIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- Burke v. SnivelyIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Glisson v. City of MarionIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Maiter v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Kalodimos v. Village of Morton GroveIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Victor D. Quilici, Robert Stengl, George L. Reichert, and Robert E. Metler v. Village of Morton GroveCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- People Ex Rel. Chicago Bar Ass'n v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.