Legal Opinion

In the Interest of D.I.G.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 17, 2005No. 93,037PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Following the district court’s termination of his parental rights, the natural father of D.I.G. and P.M.G. appeals, arguing exclusively that the district court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on the issue of temporary custody. We dismiss the appeal, concluding that any challenge to the termination of parental rights has been abandoned and that any challenge to the order of temporary custody is untimely.

These proceedings were instituted upon the State’s filing of a Child in Need of Care (CINC) petition in March 2003, alleging that both D.I.G. and P.M.G. were children…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. VergeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. Butler County Rural Water District No. 8 v. YatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  3. Goldbarth v. Kansas State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  4. Cole v. MayansSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. In Re Estate of WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re D.D.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. In the Interest of A.E.S.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2013
  3. In the Interest of L.B.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  4. METCALF v. METCALFSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  5. In Re DIGCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API