Legal Opinion

Ranger Cisco Oil Co. v. Consolidated Oil Co. of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1922No. 1295Published

Appeal from District Court, Eastland County; Geo. L. Davenport, Judge. Action by the Consolidated Oil Company of Texas against the Ranger Cisco Oil Company. From judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion

On the Merits.

[2] The Consolidated Oil Company of Texas brought this action against the Ranger Cisco Oil Company in the sum of $7,892.57 for breach of contract by defendant to drill an oil well to the depth of 3,500 feet unless oil or gas was found -in paying quantities at a lesser depth.

Defendant answered by general and special exceptions, general denial, and specially denied that it agreed to drill the well to a dei>th of 3,500 feet; that the plaintiff failed and refused to pay $5 per foot or $50 per day, as it agreed to do by the contract, and for that reason it was forced to stop drilling…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Henry Oil Co. v. HeadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Corbin Oil & Gas Co. v. MullCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. McCaskey v. SchrockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  4. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. FiedlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API