Legal Opinion

Stotesbury v. Cadwallader

District Court, D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 11, 1874PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[This was a libel in equity by Stotesbury and others, assignees of the Franklin Savings Fund Society, bankrupts, against Cyrus Cadwallader and others.]

1Opinion of the Court

CADWALADER, District Judge.

This case was heard upon the bill, and amended and supplemental bill, and upon the answers of certain defendants, and the respective replications and upon certain proofs adduced, among which was the examination of the defendant, Cyrus Cadwallader, in the court of bankruptcy, &c. Whereupon the court, after hearing counsel, was of the' opinion that the subjects of the litigation might be considered under three heads, to wit: 1st. Property and effects traceable, as investments, products or substitutes of the funds of the bankrupt corporation, and in which no defendant…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Adams v. HowardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API