Baldwin v. Silver
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
¶1 The equitable doctrine of judicial estoppel precludes, among other things, a party from later asserting a claim that it failed to list in bankruptcy schedules. Here, the appellants listed a claim in the statement of affairs section of their bankruptcy schedules but not in the statement of assets section of those same schedules. They now assert that claim in this litigation. We conclude, as a matter of law, that listing the claim in the statement of affairs section was sufficient to avoid the strictures of the judicial estoppel doctrine, and we reverse the trial judge’s decision to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Timberline Air Service, Inc. v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Baldwin v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011