Legal Opinion

Shafer v. Meadville Tele. Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1930No. Appeal 39PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This suit was brought and tried below and argued here by the plaintiff himself, who is the appellant. It was an action for damages for alleged malicious prosecution brought in the following circumstances as disclosed by the record, or as stated by the appellant in his history of the case. Plaintiff occupied a farm “as tenant and agent of the owner.” Since 1908 a line of telephone poles and wires had been constructed over the farm pursuant to some oral arrangement the terms of which do not appear. On September 7, 1923, a written agreement was signed by the telephone company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. American International Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Boyd v. KerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Auer v. MauserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
  4. Commonwealth v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Hill v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynn v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Martinez v. KorvetteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API