Fugman v. Trostler
Cuyahoga Circuit Court
1Opinion of the CourtWinch, J.
A. Trostler was plaintiff below and brought his action against Godfrey Fugman, Anna L. F. Fugman and O. C. Ringle & Co. to recover commissions for the sale of real estate. The *747amended petition contains two causes of action. The first cause of action alleges that the Fugmans were the owners of certain real estate and O. C. Ringle & Co. their agents for its sale. That Trostler represented to them that he could procure a purchaser for them if they would pay him one per cent, commission on the sale, whereupon the following agreement was entered into between the parties:
‘1 Cleveland, 0., April 1,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Childs v. PtomeyMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Wagner v. NagelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Wilson v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Manders v. CraftColorado Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cowan v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.