Legal Opinion

Spence v. Hughes

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 3, 1986No. 85-319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this case is whether a person injured while operating a vehicle owned by a Florida resident must allege threshold injuries (as defined in § 627.737(2), Fla. *904Stat.) in a negligence action against a nonresident who, while not required by Florida law to do so, has voluntarily obtained PIP coverage meeting the requirements of the Florida no-fault statute.

Appellant/plaintiff, a resident of Florida, was injured in an automobile accident which occurred in Florida. The appel-lees/defendants are both non-residents; one owned and the other operated the motor vehicle which caused the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Memorial Hospital v. Maricopa CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. O'BRIEN v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  4. Johnson v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  5. Miller v. City of Indian Harbour BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Meyer v. HutchinsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Spence v. HughesSupreme Court of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API