Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Midland Risk Insurance Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 5, 1999No. 98-1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
|,AMY, Judge.
In this tort matter involving an intersec-tional collision, the plaintiff appeals the trial court’s finding that he was 75% at fault in causing the accident. He submits this finding is clearly wrong, contending that the defendant, a left turning motorist, was at fault in causing the accident. Conversely, the defendant, in answering the instant appeal, urges that the trial court was manifestly erroneous in finding his fault to be 25%. He submits that he was free from fault or, alternatively, that his fault should be reduced. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Sanchez Fernandez v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Corvers v. Acme Truck LinesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
- Great American Ins. Co. v. TurnageLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cormier v. AlbearLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Klaveness v. MasseyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Dana Matte v. Imperial Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- Matte v. Imperial Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2011