Legal Opinion

State v. Webster

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 3, 1911No. 7800PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before J. E. McDonald, Special Judge, Anderson, March, 1910. Indictment against George Webster for forgery. Defendant appeals. cite: No intention to defraud: 24 E. R. A. 3; 19 Cyc. 1380; 8 Am. St. R. 70; 1 Am. Cr. L. 225; 5 Am. Cr. R. 239; 28 t. R. A. 127; 24 L. R. A. 33. Oral argument.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from the sentence, imposed upon the defendant, for uttering a forged instrument of writing.

The third count of the indictment, under which the defendant was convicted, charges that he did “wilfully utter and publish as true a certain false, forged, and counterfeited writing, and instrument of writing, commonly called an order, of the tenor as follows: ‘Belton, S. C., Nov. 13th, 1909. Please let this man have my express, oblige, yours truly, Eliot Jefferson;’ he, the said George Webster, then and there well knowing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. TomlinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Kohn v. RichmondSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  3. State v. MurraySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. StrandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  2. State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. Lee-GriggCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. State v. SingletarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API