Legal Opinion
Studnicka v. Carlisle
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 5, 1990No. 90-0820PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
567 So.2d 17 (1990)
George STUDNICKA, Petitioner,
v.
James T. CARLISLE, et al., Respondents.
No. 90-0820.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
September 5, 1990.
Rehearing and Clarification Denied October 18, 1990.
George Studnicka, West Palm Beach, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Carol Cobourn Asbury, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent, James T. Carlisle.
2Per curiam
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied. Petitioners who are represented by counsel should file pleadings only through counsel. A defendant who has court-appointed counsel may not act…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
- Coscan Florida, Inc. v. Equiventure FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
4Cited by3 opinions
- Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Prevatt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000