Harris v. Harris
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.
During the course of this divorce proceeding, defendant’s deposition was taken. The deposition was recessed to require defendant to produce income tax and business records. Before the deposition could be continued, defendant took the two children of the parties and fled to Mississippi. He has refused to return to Oregon. Thereafter the court entered an order requiring him to appear for completion of the deposition on a day certain. The order was properly served on defendant. The order also provided that defendant’s pleadings would be stricken if he failed to appear. ORS 45.190. ① When…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hammond Packing Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Anderson v. StanwoodOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Hutchinson v. HutchinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Sisk v. McPartlandOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Grant's Mechanical, Inc. v. OlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- In re the Marriage of WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Stirling v. Dari-Delite, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971