Legal Opinion

Brady v. Brooks

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1905No. 1495, No. 1496, No. 1497, No. 1498PublishedCited by 76 opinions

Original application to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus to the district judge.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

These cases present substantially the same questions and have been argued and submitted as one.

The questions are as to the rights of the county attorney of Travis County and of the district attorney” of the twenty-sixth judicial district of the state of Texas, to prosecute certain suits brought by the attorney-general to recover taxes and penalties under acts passed at the last session of the legislature.

On the 27th day of October, 1905, the attorney-general of the state of Texas brought a suit in the name of the state of Texas against the Higgins Oil & Fuel Company, a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Day Land & Cattle Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Harris County v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. State v. International & Great Northern Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Guynes v. Galveston CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cox v. RobisonTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Maud, Tax Collector v. Terrell, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Staples v. State Ex Rel. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1922

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API