Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. City of Boston

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

This is an action of contract to recover back money paid under protest for taxes alleged to have been illegally assessed upon land which was owned by the plaintiff, not at the time the taxes were assessed, but at the time they were paid. The trial judge sitting without a jury found for the plaintiff, and the case is here on exceptions taken by the defendant.

The taxes were assessed as of May 1, 1903. At that time the land consisted of two parcels, one upon the easterly side of Norton Street, and one upon the westerly side. They were owned by Patrick and Michael H. Norton, in fee, subject to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGee v. City of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Worcester v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. Lancy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Jennings v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. Hurd v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. United States Trust Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. City of Marlborough v. PoorvuMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Hawkridge v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API