Legal Opinion

Rowlands v. Hanson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2003No. 01-36150; D.C. No. CV-97-01645-HAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Robert J. Rowlands appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Chuck Hanson in his diversity action alleging breach of contract, fraud, and violation of Or.Rev.Stat. § 166.720, the Oregon Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations statute (“ORICO”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After de novo review, Jenkins v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 95 F.3d 791, 795 (9th Cir.1996), we affirm.

Given that Rowlands sought only lost profits on his breach of contract claim, that claim fails because he did not show “with ‘reasonable certainty’ that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
Royal Insurance Co. of America v. Southwest MarineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
Maitland v. Mitchell (In re Harris Pine Mills)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
Danny Harris Jenkins v. Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, a Pennsylvania Corporation Licensed to Do Business in the State of Hawai'iCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.