Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Schwegmann Giant Super Markets v. Louisiana Dairy Stabilization Board

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1982No. 14472Published

1ConcurrenceLottinger, Judge

I agree with the result reached but only to the extent that the plaintiffs are not required to pay the assessment.

There is no need to determine the constitutionality of La.R.S. 40:931.13 D and the companion amendment to Rule 12.9 of the Dairy Stabilization Board. Courts always avoid determining the constitutionality of a statute or rule when the dispute can be otherwise resolved.

La.R.S. 40:931.13 provides:

“A. In order to obtain funds for the administration and enforcement. of the regulations and production stabilization plans issued by him pursuant to this Sub-part and for the administration…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Louisiana Dairy Stabilization Board v. Dairy Fresh Corporation and Dairy Fresh Ice Cream CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API