Legal Opinion
Breckinridge v. Bristol-Myers Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided July 19, 1985No. EV 83-34-CPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ENTRY
BROOKS, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are cross motions to disqualify counsel. In addition to the motion to disqualify counsel, the defendants further seek to disqualify the plaintiff, an attorney, from proceeding as a party to this action. The result of such disqualification, quite obviously, would be the dismissal of this lawsuit. The Court enters its rulings on both motions in this entry.
I
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND/OR DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
John B. Breckinridge was an attorney for one or both defendants from 1959 until 1982. The defendants characterize him as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Analytica, Incorporated v. Npd Research, Inc., Defendant-Cross-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Appeals of Schwartz & Freeman and Pressman and Hartunian ChtdCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Eleanor Schiessle v. Donald E. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Dr. Ing. Max Schloetter v. Railoc of Indiana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Baird v. CutlerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1995
- Kachmar v. SunGard Data Sys IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997