Legal Opinion

Abrams v. Nat Lewis Purses, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

The petitioner raises two objections to the award. The first is that the arbitrators violated the terms of the submission by agreeing that a unanimous award was. to be necessary. Assuming that the affidavit of one of the arbitrators is admissible for the purpose of establishing such an agreement on the part of the arbitrators (See in this connection Matter of Shirley Silk Co. v. American Silk Mills, 257 App. Div. 375), and assuming further that such an agreement would constitute good ground for vacating the award, the objection must, nevertheless, be overruled, the court not being satisfied…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Shirley Silk Co. & American Silk Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Schum v. BurchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Schum v. BurchardNew York Court of Appeals · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Provident Bank v. BBT (In Re BBT)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API