Legal Opinion

Hudson P. Rose Co. v. Tompkins & Bevers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In proceedings supplementary to judgment a proceeding was begun by the service, on the vice-president of the company, of a subpoena which had printed on the back a copy of section 781 of the Civil Practice Act, forbidding the judgment debtor to transfer property. The corporate judgment debtor had a small deposit in a bank and during the pendency of the proceedings the vice-president, Leddy, signed two cheeks for current obligations. In these proceedings, somewhat obscure in their nature as to the one to be held responsible for the alleged contempt, the judgment creditor is seeking to have…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Mutual Casualty Co. v. Monarch Concrete Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  2. Ripley v. Risedorph, New York County Courts1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API