Legal Opinion

Gaito v. A-C Product Liability Trust

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 2015No. CONSOLIDATED UNDER MDL 875 E.D. PA CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-30281-ERPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

This case was transferred in January 2011 from the United State District Court for the Northern District of Ohio to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, where it became part of the consolidated asbestos products liability multidistrict litigation (MDL 875). The case was assigned to the Court’s maritime docket (“MARDOC”). Willard E. Bartel and David E. Peebles (“Plaintiffs”), Administrators of the Estate of Dominic Gaito, allege that Mr. Gaito (“Decedent” or “Mr. Gaito”) was exposed to asbestos while working aboard various…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. WeintraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sikirica v. Harber (In re Harber)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Mendelsohn v. RossDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API