Legal Opinion

Pendergrass Banking Co. v. Murphy & Sons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 7, 1923No. 14925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.

The evidence in this case conclusively established a settlement of the pending litigation before the trial. • Besides other evidence to the general effect, the plaintiff’s vice-president testified without dispute or objection with reference to the controversy involved in the suit: “I went out there and made settlement,” stating the terms. The plaintiff accepted and held the proceeds with knowledge of the facts. See Tyler Cotton Press Co. v. Chevalier, 56 Ga. 494 (5); Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co., 27 Ga. App. 686 (1 a) (109 S. E. 676). The verdict found for the defendant being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Riley & Co. v. London Guaranty & Accident Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Tyler Cotton Press Co. v. ChevalierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dunn v. MeyerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Heaton v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API