Legal Opinion
United States v. City Sav. Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1934No. 6514PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.
The trial court dismissed the appellant’s petition without prejudice upon the ground that it failed to state a cause of action. The order of dismissal is appealable. Central Transp. Co. v. Pullman’s Car Co., 139 U. S. 24, 39, 11 S. Ct. 478, 35 L. Ed. 55. The petition sought judgment for amounts equal to the value of coupon bonds which the gov-*487eminent issued to the appellee in exchange for third and fourth Liberty Loan bonds, upon which the indorsement of Emmons, the registered owner, had been forged. It alleged that appellee warranted the signature of Emmons on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Burton-Sutton Oil Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by4 opinions
- Application of Citizens Utilities CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Evans v. SchleinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Fourth Nat. Bank in Wichita, Kan. v. Gainesville Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
- United States v. The First National Bank of Atlanta, Georgia, Defendant-Third-Party the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971