Legal Opinion
Grisham v. Taylor
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1958No. 330PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLMER, District Judge.
This habeas corpus proceeding poses the question as to whether a civilian employee attached to the armed forces of the United States stationed '-in a foreign country is subject to trial by court-martial for a capital offense.
The issue arises on a return and answer to a rule to show cause granted in response to a petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by petitioner, a prisoner confined at the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, against the Warden of the Penitentiary.
The record of the court-martial was introduced into evidence.
The petitioner,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. BancroftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. AyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. ShellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Grisham v. HaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Albert H. Grisham v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Albert H. Grisham v. John C. Taylor, Warden of United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- United States v. KinsellaDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1958
- United States Ex Rel. Wilson v. BohlanderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1958