Legal Opinion

Charles Jacquin et Cie, Inc. v. Pennick

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1982No. Original jurisdiction, No. 1246 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order by

Judge Bogers:

On August 2, 1982, on motion of the petitioner Charles Jacquin et Cie., Inc. (Jacquin), we granted a rule upon the respondents Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board and the members of the Liquor Control Board (LCB) and on non-parties, Holt Cargo Systems Inc. and Holt Hauling & Warehousing Systems Inc. (Holt), to show -cause why they should not be held to be in civil contempt by reason of the asserted failure of the LCB to secure Holt’s compliance with, and the asserted failure of Holt to comply with, a consent order of this court made July 16,1982 on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. United States v. Eric HallCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Brightbill v. Rigo, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Miller v. Board of Property AssessmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Good Tire Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Board of School Directors v. AshbyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Good Tire Service v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API