Legal Opinion

Borland v. Standard Marine Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 29, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGoldrick, J.:

Under what is known as the Inchmaree clause in an insurance policy taken out on the steamboat Rensselaer plaintiff has recovered the cost of replacing the starboard paddle shaft of that steamer upon the following facts:

Plaintiff is the receiver of the Hudson Navigation Company which since 1909 owned and operated the steamer Rensselaer on the Hudson river between New York and Albany. On or about March 4, 1924, the starboard shaft, after about fifteen years of service, was found to be fractured. Although there was testimony given as to the collision of the steamer with another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Queen Insurance Co. of America v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. The Eliza LinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Cleveland & B. Transit Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mellon v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  2. Ferrante v. Detroit Fire and Marine Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Egan v. Washington General Insurance CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API