Legal Opinion

Cowser v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1913No. 2304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of incest with a penalty of four years in the penitentiary.

As stated by appellant’s able attorney, there are but few questions to be decided in this ease. The evidence of appellant’s guilt is clearly sufficient to sustain the verdict.

After the State had introduced its proof clearly making out the case against appellant, in order to defeat the State’s case and. show that he was not legally married to the mother of the complaining witness and thereby show that she, in law, was not his stepdaughter, he introduced a properly certified copy of a marriage…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  2. People v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Gannon v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Giles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  5. Battles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. People v. MelskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  4. Hood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API