Stackhouse v. Stackhouse
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JOHNSON, J.:
¶ 1 Nina L. Stackhouse (Nina) appeals the trial court’s order denying her claim for alimony pendente lite (APL) and dismissing her complaint in divorce. The court determined that because the parties had never entered a licensed ceremonial marriage, Nina’s claims are precluded by a decision of the Commonwealth Court that purported to abolish common law marriage in Pennsylvania. See PNC Bank v. Workers’ Comp. Appeal Bd. (Stamos), 831 A.2d 1269 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003). Nina contends that the trial court erred in its application of the Commonwealth Court’s decision. Because we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Blackwell v. Com. State Ethics Com'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Caspar v. SnyderDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Hutchison Ex Rel. Hutchison v. LuddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Towey v. LebowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- McCoy v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- In re D.S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.