Legal Opinion
MacLeod v. Pete's Tavern, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 16, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be reversed, with costs, defendant Pete’s Tavern’s motion for summary judgment granted, and the complaint and all cross claims against Pete’s Tavern dismissed. The certified question should be answered in the negative.
In May 1991, plaintiff Ruth MacLeod sustained injuries when she slipped and fell on the sidewalk in front of the restaurant and bar known as Pete’s Tavern. Pete’s Tavern has an outdoor cafe adjacent to the building which extends onto the sidewalk for approximately four to five…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Taubenfeld v. Starbucks Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Phillips v. Coffee To Go., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Boehm v. BarnabaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Betances v. 700 West 176th St. Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Padarat v. New York City Tr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.