Legal Opinion

Ashalter v. Peterson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1927No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, C. J.

On April 10,1922, the parties hereto entered into a written contract for the sale by defendant and purchase by plaintiff of—

“one pair of silver black fox (one male and one female to constitute each pair).
“Said fox to be from Prince Edward Island stock; pedigreed; registered; of standard size; well developed and bred to produce true to type; and to be paired with reference to the production of a high grade pelt value; and to be of a type running, as near as may be, from one-half to two-thirds raven-blue black and. the balance silver (so-called) in color.”

The plaintiff agreed to pay therefor…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. J. B. Colt Co. v. CousinoMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Bates Tractor Co. v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Bucannan v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kent v. MathesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API