Legal Opinion

Heinen v. Motor Inn Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

This is a proceeding under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Theodore Heinen, the husband of claimant, who is the appellee, was struck and killed by a passenger train at a railway crossing of the Illinois Central Railroad Company’s on January 28, 1924. The sole inquiry to which it is necessary to direct attention is: Did the death of Theodore Heinen arise out of and in the course of his employment as an automobile salesman of the defendant Motor Inn Corporation? The law that the injury, to be compensable, must arise out of and in the course of the employment is too well settled to require the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flint v. City of EldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  2. Griffith v. Cole Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Sparks v. Consolidated Indiana Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Enfield v. the Certain-Teed Prod. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  2. Davis v. BjorensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  3. DeLong Ex Rel. Sampson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Norman v. City of CharitonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API